Legal Opinion
Marks v. Powell (In Re Marks)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided December 17, 1991No. Bankruptcy No. 90-50495-S, Adv. No. 91-5001PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXCLUDE
MARY D. SCOTT, Bankruptcy Judge.
This cause is before the Court upon the plaintiffs’ motion to exclude a witness from the deposition of a party. Plaintiffs William and Ellen Marks (“Marks”) noticed the deposition of the intervenor the First National Bank in Stuttgart (“The Bank”) pursuant to Rules 26 and 30(b)(6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Intervenor bank previously designated Mr. Cole Martin as the bank’s representative during the litigation and trial. In addition, upon receipt of the notice of deposition, the bank designated Mr. Martin as the person to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. James K. FarnhamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Ivar J. Queen v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Daniel K. ConnersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Lumpkin v. Bi-Lo, Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1987
- Clark v. Levine (In Re Levine)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cox v. Ford Motor Credit Co. (In Re One Moore Ford, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1992