Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Keeter v. Alpine Towers International, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 27, 2012No. Appellate Case No. 2009-137246; No. 4995Published

1ConcurrenceThomas, J.

I concur with the majority as to Alpine Towers’ appeal. As to Larry’s appeal, I concur in result. I agree that this case does not involve the need to elect remedies or an inconsistent verdict. I write separately to clarify that questioning the entire jury and then conforming the jury’s verdict to the jury’s intent are the best practices for ensuring a valid verdict.

First, when a party raises a question about the jury’s intent for the verdict, the best practice is to poll all of the jurors or allow the foreperson to answer the court’s questions after consulting with the entire jury. Lorick &…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lorick & Lowrance, Inc. v. Julius H. Walker & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  2. Joiner v. BevierSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  3. Billups v. LeliugaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API