Legal Opinion

Van Santvoord v. Roethler

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1899PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From Baker : Robert Eakin, Judge. Action by Seymour Van Santvoord and another, as receivers, against Peter Roethler. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiffs appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chief Justice

Wolverton delivered the opinion.

This is an action upon a judgment of a sister state. The complaint recites, in brief, that the plaintiffs are receivers of the Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Company, a corporation; that on the fourth day of March, 1886, in the District Court for Brule County, Dakota Territory, the said company recovered a judgment against the defendant for the sum of $272 AO, which was duly docketed on the nineteenth day of March, 1886; that on the fourteenth day of December, 1889, an execution was issued thereon, and thereafter returned nulla *251bona;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCormick v. BlanchardOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Crane v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ronald G. Forsyth v. Cessna Aircraft CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. Jamieson v. PottsOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Newhouse v. NewhouseOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Ames v. AmesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Jennings v. StearnsOregon Supreme Court · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API