Legal Opinion

Manhattan Sepulveda, Ltd. v. City of Manhattan Beach

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1994No. B066067PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), J.—

Statement of the Case

This is an appeal taken from the superior court’s decision to deny a petition for a writ of mandate filed by a property owner. At issue is a municipal code section which permits reconstruction of a nonconforming building damaged by fire if the cost to repair does not exceed 50 percent of the building’s value prior to the fire. The municipality successfully urged that value meant the cost to replace the entire building. Our review of the record convinces us that there is no basis to sustain such an interpretation. Instead, we conclude that value…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. DeYoung v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. People v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. City of El Monte v. City of IndustryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Dean v. HawesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. LoweryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. People v. LoweryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Vaghashia v. VaghashiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API