Legal Opinion

State v. Michael Rondeau

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 18, 2016No. 2014-048PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

¶ 1. Defendant Michael Rondeau appeals his convictions for two counts of aggravated sexual assault, which were based on an information citing statutes not yet in effect at the time of the alleged criminal acts. Resolution of his appeal requires us to answer three related questions: first, whether defendant’s convictions under the statutes listed in the information violated the Ex Post Facto Clause; second, whether the sentencing court could, post-verdict and sua sponte, amend the information to list statutes in effect when the alleged acts occurred; and finally, whether the original unamended…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Ernest PhillipsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  2. State v. Michael RondeauSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  3. State v. Michael RondeauSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API