Legal Opinion
In re Crespo
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 16, 1984PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Martin Evans, J.
This proceeding, denoted by movant as a motion to amend a notice of claim, although submitted on default, poses several unusual practice questions. Can amendment of a notice of claim be sought by preaction motion? Can such an amendment be used to effectively add a party where the motion does not request such relief? Is service of a notice of claim on the New York City Transit Authority effective as notice upon the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (MABSTOA)?
Movant’s attorney alleges that her client was injured when alighting from a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Walkovszky v. CarltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- City of New York v. Chemical BankNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- Gold v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Rivera v. LaporteNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- Brinkley v. City UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Zaiman v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Piesco v. New York, Department of PersonnelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- King v. Best Western Country InnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Plaza 400 Owners Corp. v. ResnicoffCivil Court of the City of New York · 1996
- United Merchandise Wholesale, Inc. v. IFFCO, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.