Clement v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
JOHN M. BAILEY, JUSTICE
The State has filed a motion for rehearing’ wherein it alleges that' Appellant did not properly preserve? for appellate review, his complaint that 'his arrest was illegal. The State bases its preservation contention on two grounds: (1) that Appellant failed to put the State and the trial court on notice that he was contesting the legality of his arrest and (2) that Appellant’s presentation of the contention during the closing argument was untimely under Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art, 28.01, § 2 (West 2006).
Preservation of error ,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Amador v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Lankston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.