Legal Opinion

Clement v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 7, 2015No. 11-13-00055-CRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

JOHN M. BAILEY, JUSTICE

The State has filed a motion for rehearing’ wherein it alleges that' Appellant did not properly preserve? for appellate review, his complaint that 'his arrest was illegal. The State bases its preservation contention on two grounds: (1) that Appellant failed to put the State and the trial court on notice that he was contesting the legality of his arrest and (2) that Appellant’s presentation of the contention during the closing argument was untimely under Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art, 28.01, § 2 (West 2006).

Preservation of error ,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Amador v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. Lankston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Sean Michael McGuire, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API