Blumer v. Bennett
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Scott, J. cited: Goodrich v. Downs, 6 Hill [N. Y.], 438; Barney v. Griffin, 2 N. Y., 365; Leitch v. Hollister, 4 N. Y., 214; Suheforth v. Lord, 25 Pac. Rep. [Cal.], 497; Brigham v. Jones, 29 Pac.
Read the full summary
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Scott, J. cited: Goodrich v. Downs, 6 Hill [N. Y.], 438; Barney v. Griffin, 2 N. Y., 365; Leitch v. Hollister, 4 N. Y., 214; Suheforth v. Lord, 25 Pac. Rep. [Cal.], 497; Brigham v. Jones, 29 Pac. Rep. [Kan.], 309; Beels v. Flynn, 28 Neb., 575; Iledman v. Anderson, 6 Neb., 399; Tallón v. Ellison, 3 Neb., 75; Montieth v. Bax, 4 Neb., 170; Cleveland Paper Co. v. Banks, 15 Neb., 20; Cadwallader v. Blair, 18 la., 420.
1Opinion of the Court
Ikvine, C.
The defendants in error have presented a cross-petition in error to'reverse an order of the district court overruling their motion to strike from the record notations of exceptions on the margin of the instructions. Inasmuch as most of the assignments in the plaintiff’s petition in error relate to the instructions it is necessary to consider and decide upon the questions presented by the cross-petition before reviewing the case on the principal petition in error. The record filed with the cross-petition consists of the motion to strike from the record the notation of exceptions and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cleveland Paper Co. v. BanksNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
- Sloan v. CoburnNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
- Clemens v. BrillhartNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- Eaton v. CarruthNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BartleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Bennett v. McDonaldNebraska Supreme Court · 1897