Legal Opinion

Carr Ex Rel. Carr v. Stewart

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1960No. 166PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

In our opinion, the plaintiff’s testimony when con-sidere! in the light most favorable to him is sufficient to carry the case to the jury. The issues of negligence and contributory negligence raised by the pleadings present questions to be resolved by a jury and not by the court.

In the case of S. v. Hill, 238 N.C. 61, 62 S.E. 2d 532, Ervin, J., speaking for the Court, said: “When the driver of a motor vehicle on the left comes to an intersection and finds no one approaching it on the other street within such distance as reasonably to indicate danger of collision, he is under no obligation to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Donlop v. SnyderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Yellow Cab Co. of Charlotte, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Elledge v. WelchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Kennedy v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. JamesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Perkins v. CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Keller v. Security Mills of Greensboro, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API