O'Donnell v. Ferro
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—In a shareholder’s derivative action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of fiduciary duty and corporate waste, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.), dated April 27, 2001, as granted the motion of the defendants Charles Ferro and Mazal Beverage, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
*568Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff instituted this shareholder’s derivative action on behalf of Mazal Beverage, Inc.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Grimes v. DonaldSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Hart v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Katz v. EmmettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lerner v. PrinceNew York Supreme Court · 2012
- Walter v. FalconStor Software, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Potter v. ArringtonNew York Supreme Court · 2006
- Delta Financial Corp. v. MorrisonNew York Supreme Court · 2006
- Glaubach v. SlifkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.