Legal Opinion
Lerner v. Prince
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bernard J. Fried, J.
*301Motion sequence numbers 002, 003, and 004 are consolidated for disposition and are disposed of in accordance with the following decision and order.
Defendants, the current and former outside directors of Citigroup, the current and former inside directors, officers and employees of Citigroup, and the nominal defendant Citigroup, move to dismiss the plaintiffs amended complaint, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1), (3), and (7), based on documentary evidence, lack of standing, and for failure to state a claim.
This is a derivative action, commenced by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Grimes v. DonaldSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Levine v. SmithSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lerner v. PrinceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Haith ex rel. Accretive Health, Inc. v. BronfmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Glaubach v. SlifkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Lerner v. PrinceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014