Legal Opinion

People v. Peterson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 14, 2004PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (Frank P Geraci, Jr., J.), rendered July 21, 2003. The order determined that defendant is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in designating him a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). There is no merit to the contention that defendant was improperly assessed 10 points for his “…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. People v. TilleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. People v. Vite-AcostaNew York Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. WarwickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. People v. EalyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. People v. WraggAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. People v. ArnoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API