Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of Bristow
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 31, 1925No. 3103PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNAMER, District Judge.
The Burke Construction Company, a partnership composed of M. C. Burke, J. M. Burke, and C. W. James, contracted on June 5, 1922, with the city of Bristow, Okl., for the construction of certain sewer extensions and a sewage disposal plant for said city. A provision of the contract was the requirement that the construction company execute and deliver certain statutory and construction bonds, said provision being as follows:
“The contractor shall file a statutory lien bond, subject to the approval of the city, in the full amount of the contract, guaranteeing the payment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Walker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Barnes v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Ingersoll v. CoramSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Exchange State Bank v. Federal Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, a Corporation v. Line Materials Industries, a Division of McGraw Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Geddes v. Reeves Coal & Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Harvard Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Lincoln Bank & Trust Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.