Bank of America, N.A. v. Miller
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Fain, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, Stephen and Elsie Miller, appeal from a judgment of foreclosure rendered in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Bank of America, N.A. (“BOA”). The Millers contend that a genuine issue of material fact exists regarding whether BOA is the real party in interest entitled to judgment on the note and mortgage in question. The Millers also maintain that a genuine issue of material fact exists concerning whether BOA is the holder of the note upon which judgment was sought. Finally, the Millers contend that a genuine issue of material fact exists regarding whether…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- O'TOOLE v. Northrop Grumman Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Shealy v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Smith v. Five Rivers MetroparksOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. SessleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fifth Third Mtge. Co. v. BihnOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Arch Bay Holdings, L.L.C. v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- PNC Bank, Natl. Assn. v. WestOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. BeallOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Bank of America, N.A. v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.