Legal Opinion

State v. Second Judicial Dist. Court of State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2018No. 72456PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, STIGLICH, J.:

In Artiga-Morales v. State , this court held that it was not reversible error for a district *49court to deny a defendant's motion to compel the disclosure of veniremember background information developed by the prosecution. 130 Nev. 795, 798-99, 335 P.3d 179, 181 (2014). This petition raises a related issue: whether a district court acted without authority in granting a motion to compel the disclosure of prosecution-gathered criminal histories of veniremembers. We hold that the district court has authority to order the State to share criminal history information…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Smith v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. MurtishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. Eighth Judicial District Court ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2011

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. Dist. Ct. (Ohanian)Nevada Supreme Court · 2026
  2. Degen, Sr. (John) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. Edwin Andujar (084167) (Essex County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2021
  4. Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API