State v. Second Judicial Dist. Court of State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, STIGLICH, J.:
In Artiga-Morales v. State , this court held that it was not reversible error for a district *49court to deny a defendant's motion to compel the disclosure of veniremember background information developed by the prosecution. 130 Nev. 795, 798-99, 335 P.3d 179, 181 (2014). This petition raises a related issue: whether a district court acted without authority in granting a motion to compel the disclosure of prosecution-gathered criminal histories of veniremembers. We hold that the district court has authority to order the State to share criminal history information…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Smith v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. MurtishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. Eighth Judicial District Court ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2011
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Davis v. Dist. Ct. (Ohanian)Nevada Supreme Court · 2026
- Degen, Sr. (John) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. Edwin Andujar (084167) (Essex County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2021
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024