Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Gill

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 2, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Application for Prohibition.

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM.

2Per curiam

The application of the attorney-general for a preliminary rule in prohibition against Judge Gill, to prevent his taking further proceedings on a writ of habeas corpus issued by him on the application of Mr. Lowe, is denied.

Without going into the merits of the question whether or not Mr. Lowe is in contempt, it is the opinion of the judges present that, as the application here does not show that the alleged want of jurisdiction (on which the application for prohibition is founded) appears in the record or proceedings before Judge Gill, the objection of want of jurisdiction on his…

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Conran v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. State ex rel. Warde v. McQuillinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  3. Coffman v. Saline Valley RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Buffum v. StokesSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. Mudd v. WehmeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API