Legal Opinion

Detroit Harvester Co. v. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 20, 1961PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAY, Commissioner.

This controversy involves the right of the employees of appellant Company to compensation for a two week period of unemployment under KRS Chapter 341. The Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission and. the Franklin Circuit Court *366found that the unemployment was the result of a “lockout” by the Company and therefore the employees were entitled to benefits.

The Company had a collective bargaining contract with Local Union 238 of the International Union Allied Industrial Workers of America. A dispute arose between the Company and the union with respect to the interpretation and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Marathon Electric Manufacturing Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Magner v. KinneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Morand Bros. Beverage Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  4. Barnes v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  5. In Re the Appeals by the Employees of the North River Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lee-Norse Co. v. RutledgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission v. Louisville Builders Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  3. D. J. B. Collieries Co. v. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
  4. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission v. South-East Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API