Legal Opinion

United States v. Lopez-Sepulveda

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 17, 2002No. 01-50256; D.C. No. CR-00-3611-BTMPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Marcelo Lopez-Sepulveda challenges the district court’s refusal to apply a two-level downward adjustment for a minor role in the offense. See USSG § 3B1.2. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Lopez-Sepulveda argues that he was merely an unknowing drug courier and had little involvement or decisionmaking authority in any drug conspiracy. However, just because “a defendant acted as a drug courier does not mean his role was minimal or minor.” United States v. Davis, 36 F.3d 1424, 1436-37 (9th Cir. 1994); see also United States v. Hursh, 217 F.3d 761, 770 (9th…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. William D. Davis, United States of America v. Curry James WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Raohl HurshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Adebola Olumbunm Ajala v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. MacArio DuranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Jorge Alberto MerinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. GomezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Lopez-Sepulveda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API