United States v. Lopez-Sepulveda
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
Marcelo Lopez-Sepulveda challenges the district court’s refusal to apply a two-level downward adjustment for a minor role in the offense. See USSG § 3B1.2. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Lopez-Sepulveda argues that he was merely an unknowing drug courier and had little involvement or decisionmaking authority in any drug conspiracy. However, just because “a defendant acted as a drug courier does not mean his role was minimal or minor.” United States v. Davis, 36 F.3d 1424, 1436-37 (9th Cir. 1994); see also United States v. Hursh, 217 F.3d 761, 770 (9th…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. William D. Davis, United States of America v. Curry James WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Raohl HurshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Adebola Olumbunm Ajala v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. MacArio DuranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Jorge Alberto MerinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. GomezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Lopez-Sepulveda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003