Legal Opinion
United States v. MacArio Duran
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 20, 1994No. 91-50177PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
Macario Duran appeals his sentence imposed after a jury conviction of structuring financial transactions to avoid reporting requirements in violation of 31 U.S.C. § 5324. Duran, a sheriffs deputy with the Los Ange-les Sheriffs Department, was accused of stealing money seized in connection with the arrest of suspected drug dealers and money launderers. The jury failed to reach a verdict on charges of conspiracy to commit theft and income tax evasion.
The district court increased Duran’s offense level two levels pursuant to § 3B1.3 of the Sentencing Guidelines which provides such an increase…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Leon BradyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Robert Fine, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Carlos M. PerdomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Arthur Howard Hill, AKA Sonny HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott KARTERMAN, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. BuckCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. GuidryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Ronnie Joseph BrickeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Randy Glenn YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.