Legal Opinion

B.W.C. v. A.N.M.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 1, 1991No. Civ. 7882, 7883PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*283AFTER REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

The prior judgment of this court, 590 So.2d 279, has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion of August 16, 1991, we now consider whether the trial court correctly determined that B.W.C. was barred from contesting the validity of the adoptions of A.N.M. and K.K.M. in juvenile court.

The facts pertinent to this appeal are set out in Ex parte B.W.C., 590 So.2d 279 (Ala.1991), and the dispositive issue now before this court is whether…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Mobile & Gulf R. Co. v. CrockerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. Wolf v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  4. Ex Parte HicksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  5. C.C.K. v. M.R.K.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. C.L.C. v. D.W.R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. M.M. v. B.L.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  3. R.L. v. J.E.R.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  4. O.S. v. E.S.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  5. Bluemly v. LittleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API