Nelson v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Darrell Hickman, Justice.
The only issue in this case is the trial court’s decision that the State could use a witness when it failed to comply with a pretrial discovery request under Rules of Grim. Proc., Rule 17.1. The court was wrong and the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.
The defense filed a routine pretrial discovery request and the parties concede that the State failed to furnish the defense with the name of Sharon West as a State’s witness. No doubt the State’s action was inadvertent but the defense moved that she be prevented from testifying. The defense…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Earl v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Sumlin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Williamson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Caldwell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Roleson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Love v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.