Legal Opinion

Nelson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 19, 1981No. CR 81-30PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The only issue in this case is the trial court’s decision that the State could use a witness when it failed to comply with a pretrial discovery request under Rules of Grim. Proc., Rule 17.1. The court was wrong and the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

The defense filed a routine pretrial discovery request and the parties concede that the State failed to furnish the defense with the name of Sharon West as a State’s witness. No doubt the State’s action was inadvertent but the defense moved that she be prevented from testifying. The defense…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Earl v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Sumlin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. Williamson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  5. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Caldwell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Roleson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Love v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API