In Re Capper
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION.
2Per curiam
We admonish lawyer John Capper today because he communicated directly or through his client with adverse parties about legal representations when he knew counsel represented the adverse parties. He also engaged in a conflict of interest by representing a husband in a post-dissolution matter when a law firm associate of his had earlier represented the wife.
Before us for approval is the parties' Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline, tendered pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23(11)(c) to resolve the disciplinary charges pending…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of SearerDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996
4Cited by2 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. James M. BoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- IA SUPREME CT. ATTY. DISC. BD. v. BoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006