Dubaskas v. Commonwealth

CONCURRING OPINION BY

Judge McCullough.

I concur in the Majority’s conclusion that, because section 103 of the Procurement Code explicitly and unambiguously excludes “employment agreements ” from *178the definition of “services,” employment agreements are not services that can be the subject of a contract that falls within the scope of the Board of Claims’ jurisdiction. However, I write separately because I believe that, in responding to the appellant’s two-and-a-half pages of argument,1 the Majority unnecessarily undertakes an extensive analysis of prior decisions, including dicta with which, in…