Legal Opinion
William Francis Dye v. Louis A. Stender, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 23, 2000No. 98-2040PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Chief Judge.
William F. Dye appeals from the district court’s 1 denial of a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on his claim that two witnesses at his state murder trial had undisclosed deals with the government. We affirm.
I
On September 29, 1981, a jury convicted Dye of second-degree murder for the fatal shooting of the assistant manager of a St. Paul pizzeria during a robbery attempt. The evidence linking Dye to the offense was characterized by the Supreme Court of Minnesota as “so strong that it would serve no useful purpose to summarize it ....” State v. Dye, 333 N.W.2d…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Antonio Richardson v. Michael BowersoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Brian Joseph Kinder v. Michael BowersoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Calvin Whitmore v. Mike Kemna, Superintendent Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General of the State of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Thomas Wayne Evenstad v. Terry L. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- RICHARD D. CLAY, — APPELLEE/CROSS v. MICHAEL BOWERSOX, — APPELLANT/CROSSCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Patrick Lynn WalrathCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.