Holliday v. Wingfield
Supreme Court of Georgia
Advancements. Parent and child. Gifts. o Presumptions. Before Judge Bartlett. "Wilkes Superior Court. November Term, 1876. Sufficiently reported in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Jackson, Judge.
The administrator on the estate of N. Wylie brought a bill against the heirs at law, requiring them to interplead and have their respective rights to the estate settled. The heirs were Mrs. Holliday, Mrs. Andrews, daughters of N. Wylie, and the children of H. L. Wylie, a son, who died before his father, N. Wylie. The sole dispute among them was in respect to advancements each had received. The evidence was very voluminous1 and somewhat conflicting. The jury, under the charge of the court, found that Mrs. Holliday had been advanced some seven or eight thousand dollars, and the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Phillips v. ChappellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- Weems v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cadman v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Berry v. BerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Burton v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Bowen v. HollandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Barron v. BarronSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.