Richland Development Co. v. East Cherry Creek Valley Water & Sanitation District
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROY.
Plaintiff, Richland Development Company, L.L.C., as successor in interest to Spring Creek Meadows Development Company, Inc. (Richland), moves to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the order denying the motion to dismiss filed by defendant, East Cherry Creek Valley Water and Sanitation District (District), was not a final order and there is no C.R.C.P. 54(b) certification. We deny the motion.
Plaintiffs motion presents an issue that has arisen a number of times in various proceedings following the 1992 amendments to the Governmental Immunity Act, § 24-10-101, et seq.,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bertrand v. Board of County Commissioners of Park CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Harding Glass Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Brace v. City of LakewoodColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. GallegosSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Podboy v. Fraternal Order of PoliceColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- Christel v. EB Engineering, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- Dempsey v. Denver Police DepartmentColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Buckles v. State, Colorado Division of WildlifeColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.