Howard v. A.W. Chesterton Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
This asbestos-litigation appeal is being resolved upon mutual consent among the parties, who agree that the order of the Superior Court should be reversed.
Appellants were manufacturers or distributors of asbestos-containing products and are defendants in litigation initiated by John C. Ravert and later pursued by Ap-pellees as co-executors of Mr. Ravert’s estate. Mr. Ravert and Appellees contended that his exposure to Appellants’ asbestos-containing products caused meso-thelioma.
The common pleas court awarded summary judgment in favor of Appellants, reasoning that Mr. Ravert’s deposition…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Gregg v. VJ Auto Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Howard v. A.W. Chesterton Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
4Cited by15 opinions
- Krauss, C. v. Trane US Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Rost, Richard, M., Exec. v. Ford Motor Co., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- McMunn v. Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Walsh, R. v. BASF CorporationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Anderson, W. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.