Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Delogu v. City of Portland

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 20, 2004Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLevy, J.

[¶ 32] Although I concur with the result reached by the Court, I do not agree that the Portland Property Tax Relief Program violates Article IX, Section 8 of the Maine Constitution. I believe the Program vio*41lates Article IX, Section 9, and therefore I write separately.

[¶ 38] The Court characterizes the Portland program as establishing a property tax exemption, as it must in order to conclude that the program results in an unequal tax apportionment in violation of Article IX, Section 8. The program, however, authorizes a tax rebate, not a tax exemption. As an expenditure of municipal revenues,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maine Milk Producers, Inc. v. Commissioner of Agriculture, Food & Rural ResourcesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  2. School Committee of Town of York v. Town of YorkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  3. Boston Milk Producers Inc. v. HalperinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. Delogu v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  5. McBreairty v. COM'R OF ADMIN. & FIN. SERV.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API