Hyatt v. Reynolds
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
STAKELY, Justice.
This is a statutory action in detinue, brought by Doyal Hyatt (appellant) against Otis Reynolds (appellee) for the recovery of seed cotton, the produce of one and one-half acres of land. The case was tried before the court, without the intervention of a jury, and resulted in a judgment for the defendant. This appeal is from that judgment.
In June, 1941, Otis Reynolds owned a growing cotton crop of one and one-half acres, a mare and some farming tools. He also owned an automobile in need of repairs. He traded the crop, the mare and the tools to Douglas Carrell, who operated a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Shealy v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- South Carolina Cotton Growers' Co-Op. Ass'n v. WeilSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Shines v. SteinerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Bennett & Co. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Barrow v. BrentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- American Automobile Insurance Co. v. EnglishSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Hamm v. Continental Gin CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Tilton v. HortonSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Royal Indemnity Company v. PearsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Moore v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.