Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint of Mobro Marine, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided March 4, 2003No. 3:02-cv-00471Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MORRIS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs in this matter have filed a Joint Motion to Amend the Complaint, or ta the Alternative, to Increase the Limitation Fund (Doc. # 36). Claimants have filed a Response opposing the motion (Doc. #47). 1 Oral argument was held on December 18, 2002 (Doc. # 63) and the Court has been provided copies of deposition testimony referred to at the hearing 2
Factual Background
On December 29, 2001 at about 7:00 p.m., a 26-foot Bayliner pleasure vessel containing an operator and seven passengers allided with the unmanned Barge Mobro 605 which was located…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sacramento Navigation Co. v. SalzSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- The Robert W. ParsonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Brown & Root Marine Operators, Inc. And Brown & Root, Inc., Successor to Brown & Root Marine Operators, Inc. v. Zapata Off-Shore CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Liverpool, Brazil & River Plate Steam Navigation Co. v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Short v. The ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1896
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.