Kirstan Haub, d/b/a American Handyman Service v. Jenny Eldridge
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PYLE, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Kirstan Haub (“Haub”), d/b/a American Handyman Service (“AHS”), appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment against Jenny Eldridge (“Eldridge”). Eldridge cross-appeals.
We reverse and remand.
ISSUES
Haub raises one issue: Whether the trial court erred in denying his motion for summary judgment.
Eldridge raises one issue: Whether the trial court erred in not granting her summary judgment upon the issues raised by Haub’s motion for summary judgment.
FACTS
Haub, the sole proprietor of AHS, had done various home remodeling and renovation…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Scott v. Bodor, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Tibbs v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Sheehan Construction Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Blake v. Calumet Construction Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Huffman v. Monroe County Community School Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Flaherty & Collins, Inc. v. BBR-Vision I, L.P., and New Castle Realty, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Gresser v. Dow Chemical Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Gasser Chair Company, Inc. v. Marlene J. Nordengreen, Horseshoe Hammond, LLC, d/b/a Horseshoe CasinoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Hatchett v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2013
- John Gresser and Janice Gresser, Individually and as natural guardians of Elizabeth Gresser and Rebekah Gresser v. The Dow Chemical Company, Inc., Dowelanco n/k/a Dow Agrosciences LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.