Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Morris

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order vacating a judgment of tbe district court of tbe first district. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, J.:

Tbe defendant, F. K. Morris, as trustee of the Gladstone Mining Company, made application in tbe United States land' office, at Salt Lake City, for a patent for a mining claim called tbe “Michigan Lode,” situated in Juab county, in this Territory. Tbe plaintiffs, as tbe alleged owners of a mining claim, called the “Almo Lode,” which conflicted with a part of tbe Michigan Lode, filed an adverse claim in the land office, and on the 2d day of April, 1888, began this action for tbe purpose of determining tbe right of possession of the ground in controversy, under tbe provisions of §…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ladd v. . StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Bailey v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Ætna Insurance v. AldrichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Plummer v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Howe v. Independence Consolidated Gold & Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1865

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Utah Commercial & Savings Bank v. TrumboUtah Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Leslie v. GibsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Madsen v. HodsonUtah Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Blyth & Fargo Co. v. SwensonUtah Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API