Legal Opinion

Williams Oil-O-Matic Heating Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 27, 1932No. Patent Appeal 3018PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences dismissing the notice of opposition of appellant, and holding that appellee was entitled to the registration of the trade-mark “Adjust-O-Matie,” for use on adjustable and thermostatically controlled electric sadirons— flatirons. . •

In its notice of opposition, as amended, the Williams Oil-O-Matic Heating Corporation alleged ownership and registration of the trade-marks “Oil-O-Matie” and “Dist-0 Matie,” for use on electrically operated and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. California Packing Corporation v. Tillman & BendelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  2. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. HockmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  3. Decker & Cohn, Inc. v. S. Liebovitz Sons, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Inquirer Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. Pep Boys-Manny, Moe and Jack v. Edwin F. Guth Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  3. Meredith Pub. Co. v. O. M. Scott & Sons Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
  4. Pep Boys-Manny, Moe and Jack v. Edwin F. Guth Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  5. Williams Oil-O-Matic Heating Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API