Legal Opinion

First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Nichols

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1970PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWitmer, J.

In this action by a mortgagee against two insuranee companies and the title owners and tenant or contractvendee of a dwelling to secure payment of the amount of fire loss to the property, defendant Mutual Insurance Company of Hartford (hereinafter referred to as Mutual) moved for summary judgment against its codefendant, Hartford Fire Insuranee Company (hereinafter referred to as Hartford), declaring that the latter is liable to the plaintiff mortgagee for the fire loss under the insurance policy it wrote upon the property subsequent to the policy issued thereon by Mutual. The court denied…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Syracuse Savings Bank v. Yorkshire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Ampersand Hotel Co. v. . Home Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Sebring v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of NewarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  4. Rosenbloom v. Maryland InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. New York Mutual Underwriters InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. West American Insurance v. HernandezDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2009
  3. Vilagy v. Associated Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API