People v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Butte County denying the motion of the defendant for a new trial. II. D. Gregory, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
Appellant was convicted' of the offense designated “Failure to provide for a minor child.” He moved for a new trial, which was denied, and he appealed from said order. Defendant and one Bessie Worth were married in Alameda County in November, 1909. While they were living together in' Yolo County in 1911, and about a month before the birth of the child in question, defendant’s wife left him and they have been living separate and apart ever since. During its entire life the child has been in the custody of its mother. The defendant, at the time of the trial and for six years prior thereto,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. ForesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- People v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- In Re McCandlessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Beard v. Board of Education of North Summit School Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
- People v. AlvesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- State of Wyo. v. HaworthWyoming Supreme Court · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.