State v. West, Unpublished Decision (8-17-2006)

JOURNAL ENTRY and OPINION

{¶ 1} Appellant, the State of Ohio, appeals the trial court's decision granting appellee George West's motion to suppress. The State assigns the following error for our review:

"I. The trial court erred in granting defendant's motion tosuppress because the crack cocaine seized in the warrantlesssearch fell within the well recognized plain view exception."

{¶ 2} Having reviewed the record and pertinent law, we affirm the decision of the trial court. The apposite facts follow.

{¶ 3} The Cuyahoga County Grand Jury indicted West on one count each of possession of drugs, drug…