Legal Opinion
Conley v. Queen Insurance Co. of America
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided December 4, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Richardson
Affirming.
The construction and application of a vacancy clause contained in an insurance policy in the light of the developed facts are required by this appeal. It reads:
“Permission granted for the within described preim ises to be and remain vacant for a period not exceeding sixty (60) days at any one time, the term ‘vacant’ being construed to mean an empty building devoid of personal habitation; or to be and remain unoccupied for a period not exceeding six (6) months at any one time, the term ‘unoccupied’ being construed to mean a building that is…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cooper v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
- Bakhaus v. Caledonian InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
- Dodge v. Grain Shippers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Phœnix Ins. v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
- Svea Fire Life Insurance Company v. FoxwellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Travelers Fire Insurance v. Bank of New AlbanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
- Winston-Salem Fire Fighters Club, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- McKinney v. Providence Washington Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
- McCaleb v. AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. OF NEWARK, NJTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
- Westchester Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.