Legal Opinion

St. John v. Putnam

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The action was commenced on the 25th day of January, 1927, by the service of a summons and a notice attached thereto to the effect that the object thereof is to obtain partition of the real property located in the county of Saratoga owned by the decedent at the time of her death. No copy of the complaint was served with the summons but the original and the lis pendens have been filed in the clerk’s office of Saratoga county. The action is not yet at issue.

Section 288 of the Civil Practice Act provides, inter alia, that a party to an action may cause to be taken “ the testimony of any other…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Diefendorf v. FennAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of KuntzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Etter v. Early Foundry Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Moore v. KeeseyWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Noble v. Copake Lake Pure Ice & Water CorpNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  4. In re the Probate of the Will of MussmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
  5. Abels v. Rubin, New York County Courts1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API