Legal Opinion
Robert O. Brenham v. Southern Pacific Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Sutton's Steel & Supply, Inc., Third-Party
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 11, 1972No. 72-1387PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Per curiam
On the basis of the district court’s well-reasoned opinion, reported at 328 F.Supp. 119, on the issue of whether appellant was entitled to the right of contribution from appellees in the instant ease, we affirm. Cf. United States v. Moore, 3d Cir. 1972, 469 F.2d 788. See also Phillips v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, W.D.La. 1963, 219 F.Supp. 420.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brenham v. Southern Pacific CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1971
- United States v. Leta MooreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Phillips v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1963
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cullen v. MargiottaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Gaulden v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Campione v. SodenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,737 Browning Seed, Inc. v. Johnnie BaylesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Armstrong v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.