Legal Opinion

Bass v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1991No. 17007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHRUM, Judge.

In this post-conviction motion case (Rule 24.035)1 the state asks us to determine that the motion court’s judgment setting aside the movant’s felony conviction for selling marijuana was clearly erroneous. At the movant’s guilty plea hearing, the state was permitted to amend the information to conform to the movant’s statement that he had sold marijuana to a person other than the one originally named in the information as the purchaser.

The issues here presented are:(1) Whether amendment of the information to name a different marijuana purchas*524er resulted in charging a different…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. State v. EatonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  3. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  4. State v. LemonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. State v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mario Richardson, Relator v. The Honorable Brian H. MaySupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
  2. Eichelberger v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. State v. WalterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API