Legal Opinion

Thoroughbred Assoc. v. Kansas City Royalty Co.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 26, 2020No. 120068Published

1Opinion of the Court

No. 120,068 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS THOROUGHBRED ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., et al., Appellants/Cross-appellees, v. KANSAS CITY ROYALTY COMPANY, L.L.C.; ROBERT E. THOMAS REVOCABLE TRUST; and D.D.H., L.L.C., Appellees/Cross-appellants. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Parties to an oil-and-gas lease can modify the terms of their agreement. Whether they have mutually agreed to do so is a factual question. Their agreement may be express or implied from their conduct. 2. Parties to a contract can waive a condition; waiver requires intent and knowledge. Intent may be inferred from conduct,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ortiz v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. Albers v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  4. Snider v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  5. Johnson v. Westhoff Sand Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API