Legal Opinion

Cantrell v. Henthorn

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 17, 1981No. 52570PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Vice Chief Justice:

We are asked today to determine whether instructions given in a personal injury action arising out of a rear-end collision were adequate to apprise the jury members of their duty under the law, and the correct state of the law in this jurisdiction.

At trial, the parties stipulated that the negligence of the defendant below was the sole cause of the rear-end collision. Thus, the only issues presented to the jury were issues involving damages. At trial, both litigants presented evidence of the physical injuries of the plaintiff below, and of loss of past and future…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Basden v. MillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  2. McKee v. NeilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  3. Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SicklesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Huff v. DuncanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  2. Sellars v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. CHARTNEY v. CITY OF CHOCTAWCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2019
  4. Chartney v. City of ChoctawCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2019
  5. Cantrell v. HenthornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API