Legal Opinion
CHIPEGO v. ALLERGAN INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 14, 2022No. 2:21-cv-16010Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NAIDA CHIPEGO, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:21-cv-16010 (BRM) (ESK) v. OPINION ALLERGAN, INC., et al., Defendants. MARTINOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are Defendants Allergan, Inc. and Allergan USA, Inc.’s (collectively “Allergan”) Motion for Leave to File an Amended Notice of Removal (ECF No. 11), and Plaintiff Naida Chipego’s, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, (“Plaintiffs”) Motion to Remand (ECF No. 6). Allergan opposed Plaintiffs’ motion to remand (ECF No. 9), and Plaintiffs filed a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Frederico v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer v. Snap-On Tools Corporation, Kenneth Baldwin and Keith A. Kaiser. Appeal of James F. Boyer and Mary R. BoyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.