Legal Opinion

Louisiana Assessors' Retirement Fund v. City of New Orleans

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 26, 2002No. 2001-C-0735PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

hPER CURIAM.*

Plaintiffs, Louisiana Assessors’ Retirement Fund and Louisiana Clerks’ of Court Retirement and Relief Fund, filed a “Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Rule to Show Cause” against the City of New Orleans, Richard Bruñe as Treasurer for the City of New Orleans, and Courtland Crouchet as collector of revenue for the City of New Orleans in his official capacity as City Tax Collector. In their petition, plaintiffs alleged that “[s]ince 1974, defendants have failed and/or refused to deduct and remit to petitioners the sums due pursuant to [La. R.S.] 11:1481 and [La. R.S.] 11:1561,” and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. DunnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Board of Trustees v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  2. Moya v. City of KennerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. All Star East Properties, L.L.C. v. Romy Schofield-Samuel, Director of Finance for the City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2026
  4. Board of Trustees v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  5. Downtown Dev. Dist. of New Orleans v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API