Legal Opinion

Downtown Dev. Dist. of New Orleans v. City of New Orleans

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 2019No. 2018-CA-0726Published

1Opinion of the Court

Under the particular facts of this case, the unlawful conduct exception applies, and the DDD is not required to prove irreparable injury.

*931The first element of the exception obliges us to determine whether the City's action - withholding the disputed portion of the DDD tax - directly violated a prohibitory law or the Louisiana Constitution. The record reflects no dispute that the City is withholding a portion of the DDD tax to defray the City's obligation to pay certain pension funds.6 The City maintains that the DDD tax is an ad valorem tax, and that, by withholding the disputed portion of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wooley v. LucksingerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  2. Louisiana Municipal Association v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  3. City of New Orleans v. ASSESSORS'RETIREMENT AND RELIEF FUNDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  4. Concerned Citizens v. Parish of TangipahoaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. City of Hammond v. Parish of TangipahoaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API