Legal Opinion

In re Murray

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 7, 1931No. 2802PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

Appellant has filed his application in the United States Patent Office for a patent upon claimed improvements in making axle housings. Claims 2 to 7, inclusive, and 9 to 11, inclusive, were rejected by the examiner, and this action was affirmed by the Board of Appeals.

Claims 2, 5, and 11 are illustrative, and are as follows:

2, An axle housing or the like having a central annular portion with inwardly bent edges and tubular extensions, said housing comprising four segments each of a half length and a half cross-section welded together along longitudinal edges to constitute the tubular portions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crouch v. RoemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Greist Mfg. Co. v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
  3. Star Bucket Pump Co. v. Butler Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Application of LockhartCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API