In re Murray
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge
Appellant has filed his application in the United States Patent Office for a patent upon claimed improvements in making axle housings. Claims 2 to 7, inclusive, and 9 to 11, inclusive, were rejected by the examiner, and this action was affirmed by the Board of Appeals.
Claims 2, 5, and 11 are illustrative, and are as follows:
2, An axle housing or the like having a central annular portion with inwardly bent edges and tubular extensions, said housing comprising four segments each of a half length and a half cross-section welded together along longitudinal edges to constitute the tubular portions…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crouch v. RoemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Greist Mfg. Co. v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
- Star Bucket Pump Co. v. Butler Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1912
3Cited by1 opinion
- Application of LockhartCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951