Watts v. Finley
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Reid, Chief Justice.
Only headnote 6 requires elaboration. In item 3 the testatrix bequeathed all of the residue of her property, real and personal, to her sister, Annie M. Finley, but failed to state the character or duration of the estate intended to be therein devised. Nevertheless, under the terms of this item, if they be considered disassociated from the other provisions of the will, a fee-simple estate would pass, by virtue of the rule existing in this State that “every conveyance, properly executed, shall be construed to convey the fee, unless a less estate is mentioned and limited in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Canaday v. BaysingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Stivers v. GardnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Moore v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Munford v. PeeplesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- West v. RandleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Calder's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Park v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Blakeman v. HarwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Armstrong v. MertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Hungerford v. Trust Co. of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.