Legal Opinion

In re of Proving the Last Will & Testament of Maginn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Richmond county reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The surrogate of the county of Kings once having acquired and exercised jurisdiction, and not having determined the residence of the testatrix not to have been in her own county, excluded the subsequent exercise of jurisdiction by the surrogate of the county of Richmond. (Surrogate’s Court Act, § 44; Matter of Buckley, 41 Hun, 106.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of DanielsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  2. In re the Estate of HumpfnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  3. In re the Estate of FeinbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  4. In re the Estate of MillsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  5. In re the Probate of the Will EdwardsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API