Legal Opinion

Tedesco v. Board of Sup'rs of Elections

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1949No. 19449PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nick Tedesco, alleging himself to be a resident of the Third Municipal District of the City of New Orleans and a qualified voter, duly registered from Precinct No. 22 of Ward Nine, and proceeding under the State Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act, Act No. 22 of 1948, Ex.Sess., brought this proceeding for the purpose of having declared unconstitutional Act No. 234 of 1948. In his original petition he did not pray for citation upon nor for judgment against any person, public official, or board. He merely prayed that a copy of the petition be served upon the Attorney General of the State, and that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Colegrove v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Minor v. HappersettSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Breedlove v. SuttlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. City of New Orleans v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Avery v. Midland CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Bianchi v. GriffingDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1965
  4. Delozier v. Tyrone Area School BoardDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Avery v. Midland CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API