Legal Opinion

Troitino v. . Goodman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 26, 1945PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action for damages arising out of contracts made in connection with sales of second-hand machinery.

Plaintiff is a contractor engaged in road construction. Defendant is a dealer in used road machinery. Both are residents of Buncombe County.

Three separate transactions are set out in the complaint:

First. It is alleged that on 30 October, 1942, the plaintiff purchased from the defendant two Cletrac Tractors — one with bulldozer attached and the other with angledozer attached — for a cash consideration of $9,250; that as an inducement to the sale, the defendant agreed to put the equipment in…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Perry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. McGill v. Town of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Machine Co. v. . Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Falco Corp. v. HoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API